2007年10月30日火曜日

Response to four marines investigated for rape.

It doesn't matter if you don't judge marines too fast or not. The thing is if the four marines actually raped the woman or not. As far as Manuel Sandoval goes, seems like he's just getting away with the fact that the four raped the woman by mentioning if the US military were to leave Japan , everyone in Japan would get in deep trouble dealing with the North Korea problems and the China problems. The point is if some of the military members actually raped or not. He is getting off the track. The fact that he chages the point the article says means in fact he more or less admits the four military did raped the woman ,in a sense.So he's saying the US military helps Japan deal with these problems and plays a significant role so that sex crime like that is acceptable.This is the article .


The way Kevin Egan persuades us is that he refutes Manuel by mentioning having military basis around the world does not mean soliders can have the freedom of what they want. And the freedom includes rape. He doesn't mention it is wrong that the US military plays an important role in Japan but Kevin does not think it's right the US military gets snobby and feels superior over Japan just because the US military helps Japan a lot. This is the article.

0 件のコメント: